Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-10336-20181101054550/@comment-10336-20181102141457

The tiers are of course subjective, but I am not sure how to do it better. We cannot do voting, and it would be skewed to past votes anyway. The only better way do do tiers would be if we let multiple people post signed and dated tiers, but it makes the note section even more cumbersome. On the bright side, this is a wiki. I think we can simply let people revise notes and tier ranks if they disagree. So if you think my tier assessment is wrong, or obsolete, you can just correct it yourself. Worst case, we have a discussion :)

The 'special' category for tiers, hmmm. Buggy for sure, but Corazon/Hoshi, not sure if they are that special. I mean, many units are relatively unique, ex. the super poisoners (we now have 3, I think?). Or LegMarco super heal. I think they are just niche, in a way that should be explained in the notes.

The tier list is essentially there to stop people asking 'is this unit good'. Of course, this can be done in words in the short summary, but I figured might as well quantify it and do the same for special/CA/SA breakdawn.

Re: WB note, that may need revision, yes.